TREASURE Technical Team | Corporate Technical Author — Battery Energy Storage and EV Charging Systems | Updated August 2026
TREASURE’s Commercial and Industrial Integrated Energy Storage Cabinet Series ships in two disclosed configurations: 100 kW / 233 kWh and 135 kW / 261 kWh. Both use lithium iron phosphate cells and support grid-connected, off-grid, or solar-plus-storage operation, scalable to multi-MW projects.
Before getting into how solar-plus-storage sizing works, it helps to start with what’s actually on the spec sheet — not a generic capacity range, but the two configurations TREASURE publishes.
| Spec | Cabinet A | Cabinet B |
| Potenza nominale | 100 kW | 135 kW |
| Capacità energetica | 233 kWh | 261 kWh |
| Composizione chimica della batteria | Lithium iron phosphate | Lithium iron phosphate |
| Protection rating | IP67 | Not specified on the disclosed page |
| Control/monitoring | Local HMI, remote monitoring | Local HMI, remote monitoring |
| Communication | Modbus TCP, Modbus RTU, CAN, project-specific IEC | Modbus TCP, Modbus RTU, CAN, project-specific IEC |
| Configuration modes | Grid-connected, off-grid, solar-plus-storage, microgrid | Grid-connected, off-grid, solar-plus-storage, microgrid |
| Scalabilità | Multi-cabinet, multi-MW / multi-MWh | Multi-cabinet, multi-MW / multi-MWh |
One detail worth flagging directly: the IP67 rating is disclosed specifically for the 233 kWh cabinet’s page. Per IEC 60529, an enclosure rating applies to the tested unit, so it shouldn’t be assumed to carry over automatically to the 261 kWh cabinet without a separate confirmation.
A cabinet’s rated power and energy capacity are two separate decisions, and conflating them is where a lot of first-pass sizing goes wrong.
The edge case worth knowing about here: multi-cabinet scaling changes the sizing math. Two 135 kW cabinets don’t simply double to 270 kW of usable dispatch if the site’s PCS architecture or transformer sizing wasn’t planned for parallel operation from the start — that coordination has to happen at the project design stage, not retrofitted afterward.

The C&I cabinet series supports both modes, but the operating requirements aren’t identical.
| Factor | Grid-connected | Off-grid |
| Reference for frequency/voltage | Provided by the grid | Must be established by the storage system itself |
| Typical use case | Peak shaving, demand-charge reduction, solar self-consumption | Islanded operation, remote sites, backup power |
| EMS/SCADA role | Optimizes against tariff or utility signal | Coordinates battery, PV, and load directly to hold system stability |
| PCS demands | Reactive to grid conditions | Must actively regulate output |
Compared with a bundled hybrid-inverter-plus-battery pairing at a fixed kW/kWh point — the kind of setup some vendors present as a single locked configuration — TREASURE discloses its cabinet ratings independently of a specific inverter brand pairing, leaving PCS and inverter selection as a project-level decision rather than a factory-fixed bundle.
This comes up often enough on project calls that it’s worth addressing directly. Adding more PV capacity doesn’t reduce how much storage a site needs — it changes when storage gets used. A factory with a large PV array still needs enough kWh capacity to cover the gap between solar generation hours and its actual peak-demand window, which for many industrial sites falls in the evening or during a shift change that doesn’t align with peak sun. Oversizing PV without matching storage duration just means more curtailed or exported energy during midday, not a smaller battery requirement.

A few things worth stating plainly rather than glossing over. The C&I cabinet series does not have a publicly verifiable third-party certification (UL, IEC 62933, CE, or similar) at this time — any certification claim needs an original certificate file before it goes into a technical submission. Warranty terms, cycle-life figures under specific solar-plus-storage duty cycles, and exact PCS model pairings are also not published on the currently disclosed pages and should be confirmed on a per-project basis.
Pricing is provided on a project-by-project basis and depends on energy capacity, charging power, voltage architecture, connector standard, battery configuration, PCS selection, enclosure design, communication protocol, software integration, logistics, commissioning, and other project requirements. No fixed price range is published for the C&I cabinet series.
A: 100 kW / 233 kWh and 135 kW / 261 kWh, both using lithium iron phosphate cells.
A: Yes — the disclosed configuration modes include grid-connected, off-grid, solar-plus-storage, and microgrid operation.
A: It’s disclosed specifically for the 233 kWh cabinet’s page. The 261 kWh cabinet’s protection rating isn’t specified on the currently disclosed materials, so it shouldn’t be assumed to match.
A: They’re designed to scale to multi-MW/multi-MWh projects, but PCS architecture and transformer sizing need to be planned for parallel operation from the start rather than added on later.
Energy Management Systems (EMS): What They Actually Control
Solar-Plus-Storage Systems for Commercial and Industrial Sites
Guida ai caricabatterie V2V CC: opzioni da 20 kW, 40 kW e 60 kW
Soluzioni mobili di ricarica per veicoli elettrici destinate ai depositi delle flotte